3. Port Governance and Infrastructure
Noyo Harbor, an all-weather commercial fishing port, is at the southern edge of Fort Bragg on the mouth of the Noyo River. It is one of only four main harbors between San Francisco and the Oregon border. The Noyo Harbor District is a special public district and political subdivision of the State of California. It is governed by five commissioners who volunteer their service and is operated by a Harbormaster and a small staff. The Commission has the overseas operations of the Noyo Mooring Basin, budgeting, development of the Harbor District property and facilities, and it represents the Noyo Harbor District in contacts with Federal, State, County, City and other public and private agencies. The harbor features two public launch ramps, hoists, a boatyard and haul-out, and 265 berths for commercial vessels up to 65’ in length. These berths are generally fully occupied with a waiting list of about 20 vessels depending on the season. The harbor is maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers, which periodically dredges it.
The harbor area has numerous support facilities, such as fuel, ice, restaurants, and lodging. In 2018 the Harbor District created a Strategic Planning and Harbor Marina Redevelopment Plan. The plan proposes three redevelopment phases, including harbor basin dredging, repairs to the existing wave wall, installation of new restrooms, laundry facilities, hazmat disposal facilities, and a fuel dock with vessel pump-out facilities (Source).
The community also developed a Community Sustainability Plan in 2019. The plan is intended to help the Harbor better serve the interests of the local commercial fishing industry as an enduring part of the Noyo-Harbor Fort Bragg cultural heritage. More information on the plan and its recommendations for infrastructure improvement can be found on the harbor district website (Source).

3.1 Commercial Seafood Handling Infrastructure
A variety of commercial fish businesses receive, and in some cases, process the catch landed at Noyo Harbor by commercial fishers (Table 1). These include businesses that lease and operate the fish receiving stations, and other local and non-local businesses that receive the unloaded catch from these receiving station operators, and some fishers who handle their own (and in some cases others’) catch. In 2021, 49 distinct fish businesses received catch at the port including 34 fish business licenses with a mail, street, or plant address of Fort Bragg (Table 1). Fish businesses in Fort Bragg included commercial fishers licensed to receive and sell their catch, and several smaller locally owned receivers that also had retail storefronts and/or restaurants.
| License Type | License Definition | Fort Bragg | Statewide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fish Receiver | Business that buys catch from commercial fishers | 0 | 283 |
| Fisherman’s Retail | Fisherman who handles/sells their own catch to consumers | 17 | 566 |
| Fish Processor | Business that handles the catch (processes, wholesales, etc.) and sells to other commercial entities after it has been handled by a receiver, but does not sell to ultimate consumer/public | 1 | 29 |
| Multifunction Fish Business | Individual or entity that can act as a fish receiver, fish processor, fish wholesaler, fish importer and /or a fisherman retailer | 16 | 722 |
Note: Excludes Fish Importer and Fish Wholesaler licenses. Some businesses hold more than one license. If multiple licenses of a single type were issued to an individual that type was only counted once.
Like most ports along the California coast, commercial fish businesses in Fort Bragg have fluctuated over the years, but slowly declined since 2002 (58), with 34 businesses in 2021 (Figure 2). The contraction of the processing sector is in large part due to the 2000 groundfish disaster and subsequent (2003) coastwide federal trawl buyback program (Table 2). With the decline in the year-round groundfish fishery and increasing dependence on the seasonal Dungeness crab and salmon fisheries, receiving and processing businesses struggled to stay afloat. Over the same period, the number of fishermen’s retail licenses declined overall from 40 in 2002 to 17 in 2021 (Figure 2). This loss also mirrors an overall reduction in fishing licenses affiliated with the port (discussed in section 4.2.1).
Although there was an overall net loss in fishermen’s retail licenses since 2002, the number of fishermen’s retail licenses also fluctuated from year to year during that period (some years by almost 30%). These fluctuations may in part be attributed to the fluctuations and closures in the salmon fishery, which is a popular direct-to-consumer marketing species. The decline of the sea urchin fishery impacted the processing sector and greatly reduced the number of jobs available as landings are just a fraction of what they were historically. These job losses have disproportionately impacted Fort Bragg’s Latinx community who make up a large percentage of the processing labor force (Source: Personal interview, harbormaster).
Figure 2: Fish Business Licenses held locally, by type, in Fort Bragg, 1993-2021

Table 2: Timeline of selected events affecting Fort Bragg’s primary fisheries.
| Year | Event | Dungeness Crab | Pink Shrimp | Groundfish | Salmon | Urchin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | $ | Asian and domestic live fish market growth | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Sea urchin restricted access implemented | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Sea urchin season changed | ✓ | |||||
| 1990 | 🏛 | Tri-State Dungeness Crab Committee formed | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Northern California sea urchin season reduced | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | California Marine Resources Protection Act (MRPA) passes ("gillnet ban" & call to establish 4 marine reserves) | ✓ | |||||
| 1991 | 🏛 | Northern California sea urchin season reduced | ✓ | ||||
| 1992 | 🏛 | Moratorium on entry into commercial Dungeness crab fishery | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Lines of crab traps prohibited in Districts 6-9 | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Seasonal restrictions in sea urchin fishery implemented | ✓ | |||||
| 🌎 | El Niño | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1993 | 🏛 | Salmon Total Allowable Catch re-allocated to tribes (50%) | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Coho retention prohibited in Klamath Management Zone (KMZ) commercial fishery | ✓ | |||||
| 1994 | 🏛 | Gillnet ban in state waters fully implemented | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛🌎 | Federal groundfish fishery limited entry implemented | ✓ | |||||
| $ 🏛 | Sea urchin divers allowed to have someone assist under specific conditons re disability | ✓ | |||||
| $ 🏛 | Apprentice sea urchin diver program cancelled, apprentices granted full diver status | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Spot prawn trap gear specifications and trap limit adopted | ||||||
| $ | Salmon fishery disaster declared | ✓ | |||||
| 1995 | 🏛 | Commercial Dungeness crab fishery restricted access implemented | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Northern California commercial Dungeness crab fishery quality testing program implemented | ✓ | |||||
| $ | Salmon fishery disaster declared | ✓ | |||||
| 1996 | 🏛 | Take of hagfish in Korean and bucket traps allowed | |||||
| 1997 | 🏛 | Sea cucumber trawl fishery restricted access implemented | |||||
| 1998 | 🏛 | Nearshore Fishery Management Act (NFMA) passed; Nearshore Fishery Permit program established (precursor to regional restricted access) | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Marine Life Management Act (MLMA) passed | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 🏛 | Commercial hagfish fishery trap limits implemented | ||||||
| 🌎 | El Niño | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 1999 | 🏛 | Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) passed | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| $ | Pacific Rim Seafood (sea urchin processor) opened | ✓ | |||||
| 2000 | 🏛 | Nearshore fishery permit required | ✓ | ||||
| $ | Federal Groundfish fishery disaster declared | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Spot prawn fishery regulations implemented: 1-yr observer program (trawl and trap fisheries), trawl bycatch reduction devices required and seasonal closure; regional trap limits implemented | ||||||
| $ | Sea urchin prices decline due to Russian, Chinese and Korean market competition | ✓ | |||||
| 2001 | $ | Eureka Fisheries (seafood business) closes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🏛 | General Trap Permit for hagfish take required (sunset 2006) | ||||||
| 🏛 | Area and depth closures implemented to protect overfished groundfish stocks | ✓ | |||||
| 2002 | 🏛 | 1st Federal Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA) established | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | California Nearshore Fisheries Management Plan and restricted access implemented | ✓ | |||||
| $ 🏛 | Self-imposed sea urchin landing fee law repealed | ✓ | |||||
| $ 🏛 | Sea Urchin Fishery Advsiory Committee (to California Department of Fish and Game) formed | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Spot prawn trap fishery restricted access implemented | ||||||
| 🏛 | Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) adopted | ||||||
| 2003 | $ 🏛 | Federal Groundfish Trawl Vessel Buyback | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| 🏛 | Sea urchin week-long monthly closures eliminated, fishery opened partially in July | ✓ | |||||
| 2004 | 🏛 | Tier-3 trap permit for spot prawn trawler transition to trap gear adopted | |||||
| 2008 | 🏛 | Statewide salmon disaster and fishery closure | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | In-season sport rockfish fishery closure | ✓ | |||||
| $ | Eureka Cold Storage & Ice closes abruptly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2009 | $ 🏛🌎 | Statewide salmon disaster and fishery closure | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🏛 | North Coast MLPA process begins | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2010 | 🏛 | Dungeness Crab Task Force established | ✓ | ||||
| 2011 | 🏛 | Groundfish Trawl Individual Quota (TIQ, catch share) program implemented | ✓ | ||||
| 🌎 | Tsunami | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| $ | Noyo Harbor fuel dock closed | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| 2012 | 🏛 | North Coast Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) implemented | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 2013 | 🏛 | Dungeness crab trap limits implemented | ✓ | ||||
| 2014 | $ | Noyo Harbor Ice closes | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🏛 | Northern California recreational red abalone restrictions increased | ||||||
| 2015 | 🌎 | Warm water "Blob" event | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| 🌎 | Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs); Dungeness crab season delayed; Rock crab fisheries closed | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Hagfish gear specifications changed | ||||||
| 2016 | $🌎 | Dungeness and rock crab fishery disaster declared | ✓ | ||||
| 🌎 | Kelp die-off and purple urchin surge | ✓ | |||||
| $🌎 | Northern red sea urchin fishery disaster (declared in 2019) | ✓ | |||||
| 2017 | $🌎 | Northern red sea urchin fishery disaster (declared in 2019) | ✓ | ||||
| 2018 | $ | Whale entanglement lawsuit brought by Center for Biological Diversity, Dungeness crab commercial season closed mid April | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Recreational red abalone fishery closed | ||||||
| 2020 | 🏛 | RCAs off of California/Oregon coast reopened | ✓ | ||||
| 🏛 | Closure of waters deeper than 3500 meters to bottom-contact trawl gear | ✓ | |||||
| $ | Seafood supply system disrupted by COVID-19 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| $ | Dungeness crab opener delayed due to price dispute | ✓ | |||||
| 🏛 | Draft Red Abalone Recovery and Management Plan completed (adopted 2021) | ||||||
| $ | Socioeconomic Event | ||||||
| 🏛 | Regulatory Event | ||||||
| 🌎 | Environmental Event | ||||||
| ACRONYMS CPS: Coastal Pelagic Species FGC: Fish and Game Commission FMP: Management Plan HMS: Highly Migratory Species MLMA: Marine Life Management Act MLPA: Marine Life Protection Act MPA: Marine Protected Area NFMA: Nearshore Fishery Management Act PFMC: Pacific Fisheries Management Council RCA: Rockfish Conservation Area TNC: The Nature Conservancy | |||||||